Current Weather Report
 

where to staywhere to eatwhat to see and dowhere to shopwhere to investmore to discover
old town and romantic zone photo galleryMaps Puerto Vallartaphoto gallery puerto vallartacontributors puerto vallartacontact
.
.
 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
buscanos en face book
.
 
.

NATURE

          


Conservation of the environment

October 14, 2002.

Of the hundreds and thousands of concepts that may be used to characterize the second half of the twentieth century from a historical point of view, surely conservation and the environment will be found among the top ten. This is not perchance, but rather due to the tenacity shown by mankind in the destruction of his environment to - paradoxically - generate conditions that would offer him a higher quality and style of life.

This situation has awakened the interest of research institutions, non-governmental organizations, private initiative and even the state to set in motion measures that would allow for in-depth knowledge of nature. This would serve as a basis for the development or follow-up of conservation and productive projects in harmony with the environment that would thus achieve efficiency in the management thereof to the benefit and survival of mankind.

Besides appearing to be a statement on the anthropocentric vision of nature, the preceding paragraph can be considered as the strongest argument for bringing about a change of attitude towards the problematic alteration and destruction of habitats for the anarchistic development of our society.

As we can see, interest in the conservation of the environment and its components arises from man's need and desire to avoid his own extinction on the face of the earth. Thus, one of the main reasons, though not of the higher hierarchy, why he pays and must pay attention to the conservation of his environment, is the profit he derives from it. Such is the case with precious woods, the main species of fish and shellfish used for food, a certain number of medicinal plants for which there are no synthetic substitutes, the main biological control agents, decorative plants and animals, jungle fruit and many other examples that would extend these lines into numerous paragraphs.

Unfortunately, so-called industrial societies (with all sorts of governmental ideologies and forms) only appreciate those elements of nature that produce short-term dividends and that don't interfere with the big reserves of economic power, stamping out those that do not respond in the same way or with the same intensity. (This can be seen in the case of agro-chemical companies that minimize or try to stop the disclosure of the positive results obtained through the use of soil improvement methods that are compatible with the environment, or natural plague controls. Such is also the case in the pharmaceutical industry where it has been proven that there already exist procedures that eradicate gastric illnesses, but those are not adequately disclosed on purpose, in order to avoid the end of the lucrative antacid business.)

Therefore, it appears that conservation will have to base itself exclusively on the immediate use of resources, while the disdain for the "useless" could trigger counterproductive situations for society: we do not know the consequences of the destruction that we are causing and have caused for hundreds of years. Consequently, we feel that conservation will have to be achieved as a preventive measure in view of the uncertain events of the future. We do not know whether the extermination of a species could close our door to the solution to some public food or health problem. Furthermore, the disappearance of species could have repercussions on the destabilization of human populations as they are overwhelmed with problems, like the last tile that falls to the domino effect.

For the two foregoing points, we can use a most fitting metaphor: "our societies are in the position of someone who inherits a chest filled with riches, but limits himself to tearing it apart in order to sell the wood and the nails it is made of, throwing away the contents because of laziness, ignorance or hurry."

The third and strongest reason why we should create a genuine interest in the conservation of the environment and its living components, is an ethical one. In very simple terms, it is based on the fact that all living beings, just because they are, hold an intrinsic value to the human being and that this value does not depend on whether or not they serve to an end that makes them worthy of our respect. Independently of that, they have the right to enjoy this world as we do. This may be difficult to understand for some, but all we have to do is focus on the marvels that are living beings, because of their complexity, design and coloring. All are beautiful, and every time that one of them becomes extinct, humanity loses something irreplaceable. Like if a vandal were to destroy the Mona Lisa, or like the damage caused by a madman to one of Michelangelo's David's toes. In each case, humanity loses something real, but intangible.

If we give it a little thought, the region of the Bay of Banderas owes much of its success as a tourist destination to the environment within which it developed. If it weren't for these prevailing environmental conditions and the ways in which they have been exploited by its users, history would be different. Unfortunately, the productive surge of the bay has been polarized and anarchistic, and its developers and inhabitants (on all social levels) have never repaid even the smallest part of what they have taken from it, nor do they care about the magnitude of the damage they have caused.

There is still time to consider conservation measures in favor of the environment, measures that should be considered as an investment rather than an expense. The words spoken by Indian Chief Seattle over 140 years ago say it well: "...all things are related. Everything that hurts the earth will also hurt the children of the earth."

But the real world is crude and it imposes the need for jobs and sustenance, for development on a local, regional and national level, that cannot and should not be pushed aside. That is why the exploration and proposal of compatible alternatives between the environment and development is the responsibility of us all, especially students of ecology. This is why this concept is defined in today's terminology as the art of dealing with conflicts.

cupul@pvmirror.com

Archives by date

.
 

Links to other Travel Sites:

 
 
PVMIrror.com is an Electronic Monthly Travel Magazine covering Puerto Vallarta and Bay of Banderas. All our information may be copied, used and published through and by any other news media whether printed, televised and/or electronic by national or international means, respecting all its contained text and images (including this declaration), as well as acknowledging PVMirror.com as its original electronic source of information where to a link must be activated.

PVMirror.com – E-Puerto Vallarta Travel Magazine
“True Transformation of Diffusion – June 2003 - 2006"

.